Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:46:26 +0200 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: PHC: my yescrypt and lyra2 benchmarks Agnieszka, On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:01:42PM +0200, Solar Designer wrote: > I think m=62 is too much fine-tuning. I suggest that you use 64 here. > It will also bring Lyra2 to almost the same memory usage per hash as you > have for yescrypt at r=6. So we'd have both at ~1.5 MB. > > As a separate set of benchmarks, please also configure both for ~2 MB. > Please use m=80 for Lyra2 (giving 1920 KiB?) and r=8 for yescrypt > (giving a little over 2 MiB). I thought you'd complete these benchmarks within a day (thus, yesterday) and we'd pass them to the PHC discussions list by now. Since you already had the code, I thought this would be quick and easy for you. Why is this not done yet? Have you chosen to try to optimize your yescrypt code some more first? Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.