Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:40:11 -0400 From: Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Johnny test feedback (was: Mathieu's weekly report #7) On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Mathieu Laprise <mathlaprise@...il.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com> wrote: > I don't think it's the same. The john.exe used in your johnny executable has > a date of 06-01 while the john in the wiki has the date 06-15. Also, your > john.exe from the wiki works without the crash message while the one in your > johnny archive doesn't on my system. Please tell me if you got the same > result. Thanks. You were right, but I still get a "crash" if using the one from 6-15 I also put on the custom builds. I'm using Johnny on a standalone system that does not have QT installed. My intention was to package everything one would need to run Johnny without having QT cygwin etc... I'm still getting a "crash message" if I use incremental or wordlist and hit pause. I can try on my other system later tonight and see if having QT makes a difference. > Thanks for testing Johnny, we merged two new branches in master recently and > are making latest bugfixes. We'll freeze the code and put the new release in > another branch on github really soon so you'll see improvements(like > multi-session management, auto-load last session etc.) that were not on your > early build. No problem, I plan on contributing some actual code if possible, if not maybe some other Icon's or minor things like that. You guys are doing a great job! -rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.