Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 20:21:32 +0800 From: Kai Zhao <loverszhao@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Extend AFL to fuzz as you want > Neither bare XML nor scanf-like format strings can express such relations. > I'm leaning to the idea that we don't want to support such complex relations between parts of a hash at all. Get it. > Talking specifically about fuzzing, when you want to fuzz functions behind the valid() it's easier to patch this > specific check out of valid() for now. If patch this specific check out of valid(), is it matter that we fuzz functions behind the valid() using invalid hashes? Thank you. Kai Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.