Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 08:25:07 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: RFC on format alias coding On 2014-04-06 23:16, Frank Dittrich wrote: > On 04/06/2014 10:57 PM, magnum wrote: >> I'm trying to recall different use cases. We have things like MD5 vs. >> dynamic_0, and NT vs dynamic_33 but these are no different from what you >> are doing now. I can't remember any "different" situation right now. > > The other use case are the dynamic formats defined in > dynamic_flat_sse_formats.conf, dynamic_2000 - dynamic_2014, which are > similar to dynamic_0 - dynamic_14 (somewhat slower, but allowing longer > passwords). That is what triggered Jim's work right now. I have a faint memory of something else, different. Maybe I'm just confused. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.