Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 23:16:48 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: RFC on format alias coding On 04/06/2014 10:57 PM, magnum wrote: > I'm trying to recall different use cases. We have things like MD5 vs. > dynamic_0, and NT vs dynamic_33 but these are no different from what you > are doing now. I can't remember any "different" situation right now. The other use case are the dynamic formats defined in dynamic_flat_sse_formats.conf, dynamic_2000 - dynamic_2014, which are similar to dynamic_0 - dynamic_14 (somewhat slower, but allowing longer passwords). Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.