Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 22:02:41 +0200
From: magnum <>
To: "" <>
Subject: crk_timestamps


Regarding which I'm not at all sure we are done with:

What is crk_timestamps for? Is it about having user1:hash as well as user2:hash (using same hash)? Or what kind of dupes are we catching?

Our first fix seemed simple enough until Sayantan saw it trying to allocate 22 GB of memory :-)  but I'm not yet sure the second fix really does it.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.