Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 03:39:02 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Parallella: bcrypt Hi Katja, On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:28:11PM +0200, Katja Malvoni wrote: > these are results of tests on both boards. 20 test cases (both boards used > the same set), 3000 random strings, 1000 hashes, each test takes 20 - 21 > minutes. Does this mean that each system spent about 400 minutes on these? This only tells us that some problem is still present at least on "zed" with the new bitstream. I suggest that you use a smaller wordlist and a smaller list of hashes - e.g., 64 of each (with every word actually cracking a password) - and do many more invocations. This will likely trigger the problem more frequently (because more of the bcrypt computation results will actually need to match a loaded hash). Maybe you'll trigger it on the "embecosm" system too. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.