Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:35:50 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Mask mode integration with bleeding. Sayantan, magnum, Lukas - On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:11:26PM +0530, Sayantan Datta wrote: > I think we should fork another repo which will have up-to-date current > bleeding along with my mask-mode commits. I expect all new commits to main > bleeding to go into the new repo as well. I'll check new commits and > discuss if it has any potential interference with mask mode stuffs. This > way main bleeding will remain 100% bug free and I can maintain mask-mode as > close to main-bleeding as possible. I like this approach. The only reason why I did not suggest it is that it may be more work for Sayantan, but since Sayantan himself proposes it, let's do it. > magnum can you fork another repo from main-bleeding name it PG-test(or > whatever seems suitable) ? Let's use some new name, to avoid confusion with myrice's work. I like to be able to refer to myrice's tree as PG-test. How about calling it bleeding-mask? Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.