Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:20:22 +0200 From: Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Sayantan's Weekly Report #7 2013/8/7 Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com>: > Loading large number of hashes means that it takes more time to check those > hashes rather than generating them. I have few plans such as using local > memory to store as many hashes as possible, should easily store 2048 hashes > or even more depending on how many bytes per hash is being stored. Then > cache them on the fly if more hashes are loaded than what could be stored in > local memory. Or use the global memory entirely because caching will have > some overhead too. Have you tried looking at Multiforcer sources as solar suggested earlier? I do not have time to read through, but you could save some time by doing it first before trying to achieve similar results. Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.