Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 08:59:26 +0530 From: Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Sayantan's Weekly Report #7 Hi, On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com>wrote: > Isn't it just a normal use case scenario? > I guess cracking <100 hashes is quite rare. > > Do you have any ideas how to improve it? > Other tools seems to not have such problems. > Loading large number of hashes means that it takes more time to check those hashes rather than generating them. I have few plans such as using local memory to store as many hashes as possible, should easily store 2048 hashes or even more depending on how many bytes per hash is being stored. Then cache them on the fly if more hashes are loaded than what could be stored in local memory. Or use the global memory entirely because caching will have some overhead too. Regards, Sayantan Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.