Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 01:45:02 +0200
From: Katja Malvoni <>
Subject: Re: Parallella: bcrypt

Hi Yaniv,

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Yaniv Sapir <> wrote:

> Katja,
> Can you clarify this: "If I compile with -O3 I get 979 c/s. But compiling
> with -O3 has negative impact on e-gcc generated code, speed drops to 875
> c/s. "
> ... so -O3 is better or worse?

For my BF_ROUND written in assembly it's slightly better (979 c/s vs 976
c/s). For BF_ROUND written in C and compiled with e-gcc is worse, speed is
932 c/s when compiled with -O2 and 875 c/s when compiled with -O3.


Content of type "text/html" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.