Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 01:45:02 +0200 From: Katja Malvoni <kmalvoni@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Parallella: bcrypt Hi Yaniv, On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Yaniv Sapir <yaniv@...pteva.com> wrote: > Katja, > > Can you clarify this: "If I compile with -O3 I get 979 c/s. But compiling > with -O3 has negative impact on e-gcc generated code, speed drops to 875 > c/s. " > > ... so -O3 is better or worse? > For my BF_ROUND written in assembly it's slightly better (979 c/s vs 976 c/s). For BF_ROUND written in C and compiled with e-gcc is worse, speed is 932 c/s when compiled with -O2 and 875 c/s when compiled with -O3. Katja Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.