Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 01:33:43 +0100 From: Rafael Waldo Delgado Doblas <lord.rafa@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Parallella: scrypt It's true, but maybe in the Parallella's case is better use Pooler's Cpuminer* because it has ARM support and ckolivas/cgminer doesn't look like is going to improve the support any longer**. Also using Pooler's Cpuminer is suppose to mine ~2khash/s in ARM Cortex-A9 DualCore 1.2GHz***. BTW Pooler's Scrypt ARM implementation is a perfectly uncommented ARM-ASM code :-). There another Pooler's ASM versions for x86 and x64. What do you think? *https://github.com/pooler/cpuminer **https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=148826.0 *** https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/wiki/Mining-hardware-comparison 2013/6/27 Jeremi Gosney <epixoip@...dshell.nl> > On 6/26/2013 2:49 PM, Rafael Waldo Delgado Doblas wrote: > > I have checked the miner that epixoip told you, cgminer, but looks > > like doesn't have CPU support, for CPU support there another one > > called "cpuminer". > > > Ah, it looks like cgminer dropped cpu mining a few months ago. Just go > back to an earlier branch where it was still supported: > https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer/tree/2.10 > > By the way, cpuminer *is* cgminer. cpuminer was the old name, then when > gpu support was added, it was renamed to cpu-gpu miner -- or cgminer, > for short. > Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.