Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:35:25 +0400
From: Solar Designer <>
Subject: Re: PBKDF2-SHA512

Lukas -

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 03:56:44AM +0200, Lukas Odzioba wrote:
> I started porting my pbkdf2-sha512 cuda code to opencl.

Sounds good.  Thanks!

> It looks like this code running on cpu without touching SSE is 14%
> faster than current cpu version .
> john -test -format=PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512
> Benchmarking: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512, GRUB2 / OS X 10.8 [PBKDF2-SHA512
> 128/128 SSE4.1 2x]... DONE
> Raw:	92.6 c/s real, 92.6 c/s virtual
> john -test -format=grub
> Benchmarking: grub, grub [PBKDF2-SHA512]... DONE
> Raw:	106 c/s real, 106 c/s virtual
> Both tested on the same test vector and cpu.

I think you're comparing one core with C+intrinsics vs. all cores with
OpenCL.  Try building with OpenMP enabled for a more relevant comparison.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.