Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:07:51 +0530 From: Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Unify internal form of mscash2 hashes? On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:31 AM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: > Yet you wrote your own again? I suggest you use the well tested valid(), > split() and prepare() from the CPU format. There is really no need to > invent worse wheels. I can crash your latest version like this: There was a small problem , it would give false warning(hash rejected due to salt length limitation) with the old ciphertext format. At first I thought it really rejected the old hashes, but it was just a warning. valid() needs a small modification. Regards, Sayantan Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.