Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 02:07:43 +0400 From: Alexander Cherepanov <cherepan@...me.ru> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: 333 (half-badass number?) On 2013-05-18 23:55, magnum wrote: > I see we now have 333 formats in bleeding-jumbo. Do we really need it? > That is *without* building CUDA or OpenCL. It was well under 300 some days ago unless I'm mistaken. Pretty amazing. I have some faint memory of being impressed with 100 formats not more than two (I think) years ago. > > Good job everyone, and especially Dhiru and Jim. Dhiru writes a format a day or so, and Jim's Dynamic now has 168 subformats! Don't so many dynamics unnecessary slows --test and skew relbench results? I mean it's great that we have so many formats but should all of them be enabled by default? -- Alexander Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.