Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:21:01 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: --fork On 30 Apr, 2013, at 18:24 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 05:40:02PM +0200, magnum wrote: >> On 30 Apr, 2013, at 17:26 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: >>> BTW, we should only mute messages that we're almost certain will be the >>> same for all processes. In jumbo, you're also muting e.g. the >>> "Invalid rule ..." message in rules.c, which I think is wrong, because >>> this error might not be seen by the main process (MPI root node). There >>> might be more instances of this problem. >> >> Yes, I'll revise that when at it. Actually I think I'll just drop most old such stuff before merging (a lot less clashes then). And afterwards I can re-add some as needed. > > Sounds great. > > Meanwhile, I've pushed out many more enhancements to --fork, including > for its interaction with OpenMP. Please test and merge. Done. I'm testing Jumbo only, except when I find problems I verify that they do not exist in core. Right now I know of nothing specific but there's a LOT to test. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.