Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:33:46 -0300 From: Claudio André <claudioandre.br@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: src/ licensing Em 18-04-2013 22:29, magnum escreveu: > On 19 Apr, 2013, at 2:55 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: >> Fellow JtR developers - >> >> As promised, here's the portion of john-1.7.9-jumbo-7-licensing.txt >> pertaining to src/ files. I suggest that you search it for the words >> unclear, issue, your first name, your nickname, and for question marks - >> and try to clarify in your replies. Thanks! > Would this "fall-back license" addition make any sense? > > $ cat ../doc/LICENSE.magnum > Anything in this source tree that can be regarded as posted, contributed, > committed or otherwise submitted in any way by magnum is Copyright (submission > date) magnum and it is hereby released to the general public under the > following terms: Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or > without modification, are permitted. No attribution is necessary. You can make > billions of dollars from my code and I will not give a damn. I would be fairly > surprised though. > > This statement was written in April 2013 but my intention is that it will be > in effect for any future posts, contributions, commits or submissions made in > other ways. > > magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> If so, any commit i made in, for instance, opencl: md4, md5, password safe, office 2013, etc., could follow this rule. If not, i consider them trivial work not allowing a copyright. Claudio
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.