[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df90782c5afae324dcc5ee1c437cfecf@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:35:51 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: bug report
On 3 Mar, 2013, at 23:19 , Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com> wrote:
> 2013/3/3 ivan ivanov <wermaxta@....bg>:
>> the bug report :
>> my operating system is backtrack 5r3 Linux bt 3.2.6 #1 SMP Fri Feb 17 10:40:05 EST 2012 i686 GNU/Linux
>> and the openssl version is OpenSSL 0.9.8k 25 Mar 2009
>> i'm using current magnum version from github.
>> when i type ./john -test I am getting this :
>> Benchmarking: WPA-PSK PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA-1 [128/128 SSE2 4x]... FAILED (get_hash[0](0))
>> Benchmarking: EncFS PBKDF2 AES / Blowfish [32/32]... FAILED (cmp_all(1))
>
> I tried to reproduce that on the following systems:
>
> slackware 32bit OpenSSL 0.9.8n 24 Mar 2010
> gentoo 32bit OpenSSL 1.0.0d 8 Feb 2011
> ubuntu 64bit OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012
>
> with no luck.
> Any of you guys have access to 32bit machine with an older OpenSSL?
>
My 32-bit OSX builds with native OpenSSL are "90812f" whatever that means (0.9.8r?). Can't reproduce it here.
I know Jim used backtrack 32-bit and 64-bit when he wrote the SSE support for wpapsk. The 32-bit was likely the same backtrack version as OP used. He had no problems!
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
