Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 03:37:48 +0100
From: magnum <>
To: "" <>
Subject: sizeof(unsigned long)


In both opencl_sha256.h and opencl_sha512.h, you define uint64_t like this:

#define uint64_t unsigned long  //Tip: unsigned long long int failed on compile (AMD).

Unsigned long will fail on most 32-bit builds and even some 64-bit ones, because it will be just 32-bits. If you need a workaround, this is not sufficient. OTOH if uint32_t is enough, you should obviously use that instead.

Apparently some people are very fond of 32-bit builds so this must be fixed. Are you sure using long longs caused failures? Sounds weird to me.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.