Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 04:12:50 -0500 From: Brian Wallace <nightstrike9809@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Proposed optimizations to pwsafe Something I noticed when benchmarking. For some reason, CUDA runs slower in bleeding than unstable. On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Brian Wallace <nightstrike9809@...il.com>wrote: > I have some working improvements to pwsafe-cuda. I don't have the most > powerful GPU, but the improvement so far is as follows: > > Original: > Benchmarking: Password Safe SHA-256 [CUDA]... DONE > Raw: 51801 c/s real, 51801 c/s virtual > > New: > Benchmarking: Password Safe SHA-256 [CUDA]... DONE > Raw: 70593 c/s real, 70593 c/s virtual > > I do see some other improvements I can make though. > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 05:55:38AM +0100, Lukas Odzioba wrote: >> > 2013/1/21 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>: >> > > hashcat's is better, too (354k vs. 501k). Lukas? >> > >> > I have an idea what's need to be done to improve this and some others >> > sha256 formats. >> > The problem is that I will not have time for that in the next 3 weeks >> > because of exams. >> > I planned for this weekend some other minor/trivial changes that I >> > think we need before jumbo release, but that's all what I can do at >> > the moment. >> > I added this task next to gpu pbkdf2-sha512 to my todo list. >> >> Sounds fine. Meanwhile: >> >> <gat3way> OK I am in the pwsafe game too. @hashcat you beat me by several >> K c/s :) http://t.co/CIXK83FT >> >> http://twitter.com/gat3way/status/294968226209726464/photo/1 >> >> Alexander >> > > Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.