Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 02:29:57 -0500 From: Brian Wallace <nightstrike9809@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Proposed optimizations to pwsafe I have some working improvements to pwsafe-cuda. I don't have the most powerful GPU, but the improvement so far is as follows: Original: Benchmarking: Password Safe SHA-256 [CUDA]... DONE Raw: 51801 c/s real, 51801 c/s virtual New: Benchmarking: Password Safe SHA-256 [CUDA]... DONE Raw: 70593 c/s real, 70593 c/s virtual I do see some other improvements I can make though. On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 05:55:38AM +0100, Lukas Odzioba wrote: > > 2013/1/21 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>: > > > hashcat's is better, too (354k vs. 501k). Lukas? > > > > I have an idea what's need to be done to improve this and some others > > sha256 formats. > > The problem is that I will not have time for that in the next 3 weeks > > because of exams. > > I planned for this weekend some other minor/trivial changes that I > > think we need before jumbo release, but that's all what I can do at > > the moment. > > I added this task next to gpu pbkdf2-sha512 to my todo list. > > Sounds fine. Meanwhile: > > <gat3way> OK I am in the pwsafe game too. @hashcat you beat me by several > K c/s :) http://t.co/CIXK83FT > > http://twitter.com/gat3way/status/294968226209726464/photo/1 > > Alexander > Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.