[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:20:12 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: SIGALRM and new 'done' method
On 12 Jan, 2013, at 15:15 , Claudio André <claudioandre.br@...il.com> wrote:
> Em 12-01-2013 11:56, magnum escreveu:
>> On 12 Jan, 2013, at 14:55 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
>>> I could reproduce the initial SIGALRM problem we had before 3040fc9 by forcing OS_TIMER=0 in arch.h but I can't reproduce this one. And I really can't see how 4a7c6df could fail to resolve the issue.
>>>
>>> Does this only ever happen when testing several (ie. all) formats? If so, that is likely a clue.
>> Oh and BTW, are you using --test=0 or just --test, or something else?
>>
>> magnum
>>
> make *-opencl
> ../run/john -t
Try -t=0, it's a LOT faster but you don't get proper speed results (at least not for CPU formats).
> Only see it when testing several (ie. all) formats.
>
> Hey, it is OSS.
> - git clone git@...hub.com:claudioandre/JohnTheRipper.git
>
> master branch.
I already did :) But like I said, I can't reproduce it on OSX. It's signal() function remains installed after a signal has been delivered.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
