Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:23:08 -0200 From: Claudio André <claudioandre.br@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: SIGALRM and new 'done' method Em 12-01-2013 12:20, magnum escreveu: > On 12 Jan, 2013, at 15:15 , Claudio André <claudioandre.br@...il.com> wrote: >> Em 12-01-2013 11:56, magnum escreveu: >>> On 12 Jan, 2013, at 14:55 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: >>>> I could reproduce the initial SIGALRM problem we had before 3040fc9 by forcing OS_TIMER=0 in arch.h but I can't reproduce this one. And I really can't see how 4a7c6df could fail to resolve the issue. >>>> >>>> Does this only ever happen when testing several (ie. all) formats? If so, that is likely a clue. >>> Oh and BTW, are you using --test=0 or just --test, or something else? >>> >>> magnum >>> >> make *-opencl >> ../run/john -t > Try -t=0, it's a LOT faster but you don't get proper speed results (at least not for CPU formats). > >> Only see it when testing several (ie. all) formats. >> >> Hey, it is OSS. >> - git clone git@...hub.com:claudioandre/JohnTheRipper.git >> >> master branch. > I already did :) But like I said, I can't reproduce it on OSX. It's signal() function remains installed after a signal has been delivered. > > magnum The last time i tried it on bull, it failed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.