Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:36:01 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: bitslice DES on GPU Hi Sayantan, On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:18:17AM +0530, Sayantan Datta wrote: > I can see that the base address for K array is in very close proximity to > the addresses stored in *KSp which I guess is intentional. When I send > the K array to GPU its base address gets changed creating problem. Can > you suggest a possible solution for this probelm? I'm keeping > DES_BS_EXPAND=1. Do you mean the base address gets changed on the CPU side or the GPU side? Relative to what does it change? What problem does this create, exactly? I can interpret your statements/question in too many ways for me to try answering directly right away. Please clarify. Thanks, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.