Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:49:54 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: SRP On 2012-08-16 02:44, jfoug@....net wrote: >> On 2012-08-15 19:20, jfoug wrote: >>> I have fixed the warnings, and added OMP. The change has been pushed >>> to jumbo-bleeding (9c0169a). >> >> You should have pushed it to magnum-jumbo. Now I had to cherry-pick the >> fixes "backwards" to magnum-jumbo and could not avoid it being merged >> back as a dupe no-op commit to bleeding, confusing history. No problem, >> just consider this for future patches. > > Sorry, I thought it was only pushed to bleeding. Also, that format has > format version #defines in it, so it 'should' be safe to have exact same > file in mag-jumbo as in mag-bleeding. No problem. The version-independant format structs I really like. Dhiru has learned them too, thank God! > I will have to look to see what the problem is. I may have not properly > done an #if 1 or something. I have some code in there, that I am pretty > sure will ONLY work on LE 32 bit systems. It was really only a test, to > try to squeeze more out of GMP, by avoiding setter and getter code. But > it did not impact speed, a great deal. I did some PDQ checks but did not find the problem. No sweat as long as it builds. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.