Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:44:39 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: SRP

> On 2012-08-15 19:20, jfoug wrote:
>> I have fixed the warnings, and added OMP.  The change has been pushed
>> to jumbo-bleeding (9c0169a).
> You should have pushed it to magnum-jumbo. Now I had to cherry-pick 
> the
> fixes "backwards" to magnum-jumbo and could not avoid it being merged
> back as a dupe no-op commit to bleeding, confusing history. No 
> problem,
> just consider this for future patches.

Sorry, I thought it was only pushed to bleeding. Also, that format has 
format version #defines in it, so it 'should' be safe to have exact same 
file in mag-jumbo as in mag-bleeding.

I will have to look to see what the problem is. I may have not properly 
done an #if 1 or something. I have some code in there, that I am pretty 
sure will ONLY work on LE 32 bit systems.  It was really only a test, to 
try to squeeze more out of GMP, by avoiding setter and getter code.  But 
it did not impact speed, a great deal.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.