Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:49:13 +0200
From: magnum <>
Subject: Re: Would supporting ./john --help be a good idea?

On 2012-07-06 00:42, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> I'll need to move quite some code from options.c to john.c, so the patch
> might be difficult to review (and jumbo diverges even more from core,
> but other than that, I see no problem.
> (I did, however, not even start with that change.)
> If I don't move all the code that is needed only for print_usage from
> options.c to john.c, then the only caller of print_usage() would be in a
> different file than the definition...

OK, I think it's a bad thing we diverge more than needed from core. It's
hard to follow, and hard to merge core changes.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.