Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 03:10:49 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: XSHA512 in Test Suite On 2012-07-02 01:02, magnum wrote: > On 2012-07-01 03:42, myrice wrote: >> We don't have xsha512.in in TS. I also tested >> them(xsha512-cuda/opencl) and believe them also reliable now. So can >> we remove "unreliable, will miss guesses" in these format also? > > We do now. CUDA passes in 13 seconds and the "unreliable" is now removed > from the format name. I'm still testing OpenCL. For some reason it takes > AGES. > > A problem is that TS loads 1500 passwords with 1500 different salts and > the dictionary that will crack all of them fits in your GWS of 2M. This > is not very realistic and is known to slow down some other test cases > too, even on CPU. But why doesn't the CUDA format suffer much from this > at all? It has a mkpc of 512K. It actually takes like 3.5 hours vs CUDA's 26 seconds. Something is not right. form=xsha512-cuda guesses: 1468 time: 0:00:00:13 [PASSED] .pot CHK:xsha512-cuda guesses: 1468 time: 0:00:00:13 [PASSED] form=xsha512-opencl guesses: 1050 time: 0:01:47:10 [PASSED] The .pot file check will likely take 1:47 also, so totalling 3:34. However, I now removed the "unreliable" tag for that format too. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.