[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 05:22:14 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Jumbo candidate vs Test Suite
Lukas, magnum -
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 03:17:10AM +0200, Lukas Odzioba wrote:
> Current status:
>
> form=mscash-cuda guesses: 1216 time: 0:00:00:10 :
> Expected count(s) (1430) [!!!FAILED!!!]
> .pot CHK:mscash-cuda guesses: 1216 time: 0:00:00:09 [PASSED]
> form=mscash2-cuda guesses: 1050 time: 0:00:00:22 :
> Expected count(s) (1479) [!!!FAILED!!!]
> .pot CHK:mscash2-cuda guesses: 1050 time: 0:00:00:19 [PASSED]
>
> Solution: We're throwing out of jumbo-6 those formats. If they're not
> working, they're useless.
Can we add " unreliable, may miss guesses" to ALGORITHM_NAME instead?
jumbo is not supposed to be bug-free - it has way too many bugs no
matter what we do. ;-) So having some (worst) bugs documented makes
some sense. ;-)
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
