Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 05:22:14 +0400
From: Solar Designer <>
Subject: Re: Jumbo candidate vs Test Suite

Lukas, magnum -

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 03:17:10AM +0200, Lukas Odzioba wrote:
> Current status:
> form=mscash-cuda                  guesses: 1216 time: 0:00:00:10 :
> Expected count(s) (1430)  [!!!FAILED!!!]
> .pot CHK:mscash-cuda              guesses: 1216 time: 0:00:00:09  [PASSED]
> form=mscash2-cuda                 guesses: 1050 time: 0:00:00:22 :
> Expected count(s) (1479)  [!!!FAILED!!!]
> .pot CHK:mscash2-cuda             guesses: 1050 time: 0:00:00:19  [PASSED]
> Solution: We're throwing out of jumbo-6 those formats. If they're not
> working, they're useless.

Can we add " unreliable, may miss guesses" to ALGORITHM_NAME instead?

jumbo is not supposed to be bug-free - it has way too many bugs no
matter what we do. ;-)  So having some (worst) bugs documented makes
some sense. ;-)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.