Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:46:06 +0200
From: magnum <>
Subject: Re: committed patches

On 2012-06-25 18:37, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 06:09 PM, magnum wrote:
>> For now, I did not apply the Markov-split-by-percent. I personally think
>> it's too near release and there may be dragons: Apart from the merge
>> problems it will give me (albeit on non-public trees), what happens if
>> you run MPI and use this option? And for that matter, what *should*
>> happen if you do?
> As a compromise, don't apply the doc/MARKOV change, but just the source
> code change.
> Then, we replace one implementation of undefined/undocumented behavior
> start:end 10%:20% treated as 10:20
> with another one
> start:end 10%:20% treated as percent values instead of absolute values.
> So that the brave users get a new feature.

Brave users don't need it, they enjoy the quirky wonders of MPI ;-)

Committed now. Meld is a frigging excellent tool, I did not even get the 
merging problems I feared in the contest tree.

I did not drop the docs, we can just as well have it documented. I bet 
more people will use this than MPI anyway (doh!).

fead039 Fix linux-x86-64-icc target for HAVE_NSS case (Frank Dittrich)
ed9ee22 Fix --list=? output (new-line/trailing space) (Frank Dittrich)
47def68 Markov: first convert start % value, then end % value (Frank 
2c5a95a Markov: allow start and/or end to be specified in percent (Frank 

I need to fix my icc, but your HAVE_NSS patch can't be wrong.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.