Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:50:33 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Markov: allow start and/or end to be specified in percent On 2012-06-25 15:41, Frank Dittrich wrote: > On 06/25/2012 02:26 PM, Frank Dittrich wrote: >> Or should this idea be dropped, and I should allow >> >> --markov=[MODE:]LEVEL:START/END[:LEN] > > Thinking further, this would be unnecessary if --node=MIN[-MAX]/COUNT > would be supported. > I think that code is currently not even in bleeding. > But was the code that broken that it wouldn't be a good addition for > next jumbo? > I know that --fork had problems, but --node? AFAIK --node does not have any problems, in the contest tree it is unified with the MPI code and fairly well tested. I could implement --node for post-Jumbo-6 if people wants it (this will also automatically split any other cracking mode for node x out of y) The changes you propose will be a minor pain for me to merge with magnum-contest and/or it will likely make implementing --node harder (right now it would be very easy because I keep the contest tree up to par with bleeding). magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.