Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:22:28 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Use a different format name for raw-sha1-ng, because of max. pw len 15 instead of 55 To let relbench compare an implementation which supports a maximum password length of 15 with one that supports a maximum password length of 55 would IMHO not be correct. That's why, make sure raw-sha1-ng uses a different format name. ALexander wanted all different implementations of one algorithm to use different format names - at least for implementations with different features (like different maximum password length supported) I agree, With this patch, raw-sha1-ng uses "Raw SHA-1 (pwlen <= 15)" instead of "Raw SHA-1". Frank View attachment "0001-Use-a-different-format-name-for-raw-sha1-ng-due-to-m.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (842 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.