Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:32:34 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: doc/DYNAMIC On 2012-06-25 01:23, Frank Dittrich wrote: > He shouldn't have used dynamic_66 anyway; > Since mentioning this in doc/DYNAMIC doesn't seem to be good enough, > should we also add a comment mentioning that names up to dynamic_999 are > reserved? The patch does that for dynamic.conf. > > I also noticed that the documentation for dynamic formats wasn't really > up to date. > I tried to improve that a little bit with my patch. Please have a look. > > Probably more can be done here. Looks fine to me, I'll commit it. > Some of the Examples included in doc/DYNAMIC are syntactically not > correct, and john will complain about errors: > (But may be the errors existed for a long time, and we have more > important errors to fix.) ... > May be for jumbo-6, I'll just add a cleanup patch deleting the incorrect > examples from doc/DYNAMIC. > If someone wants to add correct examples, this should be easy by > fetching the old revision. I'm not sure. Jim, you there? magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.