Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:36:21 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: "group work size" On 2012-06-24 21:24, Solar Designer wrote: > magnum, Lukas, Claudio - > > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 03:46:42PM -0300, Claudio Andr?? wrote: >> At this moment we are using (and my vote is to keep them): >> - Local work size (LWS) and global work size (GWS). >> >> LWS = work group size >> GWS = keys per crypt (recently changed) I prefer to call them local work-size and global work-size. Actually, global work-size == keys per crypt for non-vectorized formats only. For a vectorized format it will normally be GWS == keys_per_crypt/4 > It'd be nice to have this corrected today, before we release this stuff > as part of a -jumbo version for the first time. I agree. I can do it in a couple of hours unless someone beats be to it. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.