Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 23:24:53 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: "group work size" (was: WPA-PSK fixes, OpenMP support) magnum, Lukas, Claudio - On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 03:46:42PM -0300, Claudio Andr?? wrote: > At this moment we are using (and my vote is to keep them): > - Local work size (LWS) and global work size (GWS). > > LWS = work group size > GWS = keys per crypt (recently changed) > > Not sure whom use these names on the first time, but they are not only > here: they are on the OpenCL "way" too. I was referring to the words "group work size", which many JtR formats print right now. I think this is a JtR'ism that we need to replace with a proper OpenCL term. Google web search for "group work size" finds john-dev postings first, confirming that we're being weird. It'd be nice to have this corrected today, before we release this stuff as part of a -jumbo version for the first time. Thanks, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.