Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:05:46 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: relbench and changed format names On 06/22/2012 12:49 AM, Solar Designer wrote: >> Benchmarking: MySQL [32/32 (label mysql-fast)]... DONE > > Will be: > > MySQL (label mysql-fast) Another option, let it be just MySQL, move MySQL (label mysql) to unused, let benchmark-unify map all possible names of older versions (MYSQL and MYSQL_fast) to MySQL, and let relbench pick the fastest benchmark it finds for that format for the comparison. >> Benchmarking: NT MD4 [128/128 SSE2 + 32/32]... DONE > > NT MD4 (label nt) > >> Benchmarking: NT MD4 [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 12x]... DONE > > NT MD4 (label nt2) Here, I agree >> Benchmarking: Raw SHA-1 [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 8x]... DONE > > Raw SHA-1 (label raw-sha1) > >> Benchmarking: Raw SHA-1 [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 4x]... DONE > > Raw SHA-1 (label raw-sha1-ng) Since raw-sha1-ng supports a smaller maximum password length, I would make that more obvious and vote for Raw SHA-1 vs. Raw SHA-1 (maxlen 15) or something similar. Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.