Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 03:21:33 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: relbench and changed format names On 06/22/2012 12:04 AM, Frank Dittrich wrote: > On 06/21/2012 04:48 PM, Solar Designer wrote: >> Maybe we can even >> include that script along with jumbo-6. In fact, maybe that script >> shouldn't be specific to this one occasion, but should be a script to >> turn all historical format names to what they're currently called in >> whatever revision of jumbo the script is included with. > > This gets tricky because now some formats that used different format > names in jumbo-5 now use the same format name. Another problem is that formats which used to distinguish between "Many salts" and "Only one salt" or short and long passwords in a previous release don't in a new release and vice versa. $ grep -A 2 "HMAC MD5" j?-sse* j5-sse2i-omp.txt:Benchmarking: HMAC MD5 [SSE2i 12x]... DONE j5-sse2i-omp.txt-Raw: 1870K c/s real, 1870K c/s virtual j5-sse2i-omp.txt- -- j6-sse2i-omp.txt:Benchmarking: HMAC MD5 [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 12x]... DONE j6-sse2i-omp.txt-Many salts: 1750K c/s real, 1733K c/s virtual j6-sse2i-omp.txt-Only one salt: 1110K c/s real, 1110K c/s virtual Don't ask me why this format got slower (on 32 bit linux, with sse2i and OMP). The point is, I had just one benchmark result in jumbo-5, now I have 2. Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.