Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:35:02 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: RFC: Add --list=format-details support? On 06/19/2012 10:07 PM, magnum wrote: > On 2012-06-19 18:56, Frank Dittrich wrote: >> The attached patch is not intended to be applied as-is. > > Ah, you know I'm trigger-happy :) > >> May be other format details than those I picked are more important (or >> interesting as well), may be I should't use %d to printf >> format->params.flags, may be I should print format->params.format_name >> as the last column instead of as the second column, and so on. > > The reason I do like to commit experimental patches like this one is > that otherwise I'll never *really* test it. > >> May be we just replace the current --list=formats output > > I think not. They have different use scenarios. I think this is fine. What is your usage scenario for --list=formats? For --list=format-details I am just worried that we didn't think enough about the exact output format, about other information that should be included. At least prior to releasing the next jumbo version, we should either be sure that a future change is unlikely, or we should release the next jumbo version without --list=format-details, and wait until we collect some more requirements for GUI development etc. Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.