Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:41:33 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Sorted format list On 02/21/2012 11:36 AM, Lukas Odzioba wrote: > 2012/2/21 magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>: > >> Also, I'd really like the CUDA formats renamed to eg. >> cryptmd5-cuda so they end up in the "right" place in this list. >> This would make it easier to notice that a certain format has >> alternatives. >> >> Even after that, we have inconsistencies like sha-crypt-256 vs. >> cryptsha256-cuda. I'm willing to rename sha-crypt-256 to just >> cryptsha256 (it's shorter!). There are other cases, like >> salted-sha1 >> > Sorting is ok. I'll remove cuda prefixes today. What with raw > formats like: cuda-rawsha256 raw-sha256 > > Should they have "raw-" prefix or just "raw" like you proposed for > crypt? I think we should keep the raw- prefix as it's established already for sha1 and md5. On 02/21/2012 11:40 AM, Raphaël Rigo wrote: > wouldn't it make more sense to name raw formats like this : md5-raw ? > It would be easier to find them, I always find myself typing md5-raw > first. Same here, I sort of agree but it is too late. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.