Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:33:02 -0800 From: Alain Espinosa <alainesp@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Windows cracker benchmark comparison script On 1/16/12, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > For MSCash (which is salted), I think it will make more sense to report > raw hashing speed rather than passwords tested per second. Then you'll > be able to reasonably show how it scales up to 1M hashes and beyond. Maybe, i choose to not do that because i think will be confusing some formats one way and MSCASH in another. > Also, I think testing on longer passwords (8 characters or so, 7 for LM) > will be of more practical relevance. I understand that your choice of > length 5 might be related to JtR's shortcoming where you can't easily > get incremental mode to terminate early by other means, except with an > external mode which would introduce overhead. I got to introduce a fast > built-in mask mode or the like. I will investigate ways to support that. If you support it in John of course is better. In develop version of this scripts i added support to SamInside, PasswordsPro and PPA. This programs bench with length 7. I try to add Cain too, but his GUI is tricky. There is no longer a need of Java VM, so program is in C++ . saludos, alain
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.