Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:08:34 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Dragonfly BSD SHA2 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:06:41AM +0100, magnum wrote: > The 32-bit DragonFly formats are now confirmed correct for hashes from a > real system. Great! > I suppose I need to make two separate formats for the 64-bit versions. Yes. I think they can share the same source files with the 32-bit formats, but provide extra format structs. > And maybe the 64-bit versions should have precedence when auto-loading? Yes, unless it turns out that the extra 4 bytes (after the explicit magic string) actually differ between DragonFly versions on 64-bit. You may need to make two or more 64-bit installs of DragonFly (different versions - e.g., just after they introduced this SHA-2 stuff vs. latest). Thanks, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.