Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:35:44 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: cracking RADIUS shared secrets with john the ripper Hi Didier, I am sorry for the delay on this. On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 07:48:02PM +0100, Didier Arenzana wrote: > I had not think of the problem that could this change raise. I intend > to change the license in this way, removing reference to binary > builds, since it does not really male sense for a utility perl script > : > > "Redistribution and use in source form, with or without modification, > are permitted, > as long as the above copyright notice and this paragraph are > duplicated in all such forms" > > Would this be ok ? No, this is worse than what you wrote originally. Besides requiring attribution, now you also disallow binary builds, including of derived versions (which might be in a language other than Perl). Now this is definitely incompatible e.g. with GNU GPL. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.