Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:50:46 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: jumbo rebased on current CVS 2011-11-10 20:23, Solar Designer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 01:03:09AM +0100, magnum wrote: >> I have a perfectly working jumbo + all incremental patches, rebased >> on current CVS and with all salt_hash functions revised - no >> problems with that so far. > > Did you run that one through the test suite? The new DES key setup has > separate little pieces of code per key bit, and I'm afraid I never > actually tested it on LM hash passwords with 8th bit set in any > character. Does the test suite have such samples (I guess so)? I'd > appreciate your help in testing this, preferably with multiple make > targets (there are three assembly implementations and several variations > of the C implementation). It completes the test suite without a glitch. But now that you mention this, I'll do some manual testing as well. I also need to verify that LM uppercasing of "encodings" works correctly after the rebase - this is still missing in the Test Suite. > I think the test suite doesn't directly support non-jumbo, which is why > I am asking this in jumbo context. Jim put some magic in to detect when testing a non-Jumbo - it will be handled properly. For a non-Jumbo, I believe the latest published version of the Test Suite is fine (for jumbo, it is not fully updated yet for md5_gen -> dynamic). magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.