Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 08:47:01 -0500 From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net> To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: jumbo-6 (my status report) I had mentioned that I was done with all development going towards j6. This is no longer true. Thus, it would be smart to not try to move J6 forward at this time (or if we do, to remove the pkzip, and keep it as a 'after jumbo' patch). I am working on making changes to the pkzip format. It may actually change the 'format' of the hash lines. So, we may want to hold up j6 for a short while, while some research is being done. I would rather not see the format put out to the general public, and then have the signature/layout of the format line change. It is possible that the ascii 'quick check' may be removed. It has been really hard to get it to not give false negatives, and there have been other difficulties. It may be able to be replaced with some better logic on the 'full' decrypt/inflate/checksum code. Ascii mode was put in as a heuristic optimization. However, hacking on it again and again to have it 'avoid' false negatives, and never knowing if we really have gotten them all, causes a different approach to be looked into. Also, the fact that if there IS no known ascii file in there (and we also have looked into adding many other 'magic' file signatures into this quick check), that we need to have the full test work faster for us. Jim. Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.