Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 22:33:50 +0200 From: magnum <rawsmooth@...dband.net> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: patches page update On 2011-07-24 17:12, magnum wrote: > On 2011-07-24 16:04, Solar Designer wrote: >> Is the primary reason for your patch file naming change that there were >> too many files in the john directory? > > No, it's actually git's naming scheme. I just do "git format-patch xx" Maybe I should add that I never intended to introduce a new naming standard, I was just lazy and didn't expect Jim to follow. But right now I think it's pretty clear - there is no doubt about patch order. Anyway I'll keep using this naming scheme at least for this run of the Jumbo mill. I just uploaded a 0006 patch, that does nothing important but opens up for easier life in the future. Simplified code, unified get_key() functions for a number of formats that previously had a separate get_key_utf8(). magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.