[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:15:04 +0300
From: Shinnok <admin@...nnok.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Aleksey's Status Report - #5 of 15
https://github.com/shinnok/johnny/commit/d63ea8716df137a4d3752c1bea6846614a93cd1f
Does this look fit?
On 06/16/2011 10:36 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> Shinnok,
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:01:47PM +0300, Shinnok wrote:
>> Alexander, 2 clause BSD is ok,
>
> Yes, but:
>
>> or something else more appropriate for
>> JtR, as specified here http://openwall.info/wiki/john/licensing?
>
> Yes, I prefer 0-clause BSD, so to speak. Just the copyright and
> permission statements that you'd find in a BSD license, but with the
> restrictive clauses completely removed. I simply see no reason to
> impose those restrictions.
>
> This is what I use for my own code lately (with some exceptions) - e.g.,
> blists, which we released earlier this month, is fully under this kind
> of license.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
