Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:36:49 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Aleksey's Status Report - #5 of 15 Shinnok, On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:01:47PM +0300, Shinnok wrote: > Alexander, 2 clause BSD is ok, Yes, but: > or something else more appropriate for > JtR, as specified here http://openwall.info/wiki/john/licensing? Yes, I prefer 0-clause BSD, so to speak. Just the copyright and permission statements that you'd find in a BSD license, but with the restrictive clauses completely removed. I simply see no reason to impose those restrictions. This is what I use for my own code lately (with some exceptions) - e.g., blists, which we released earlier this month, is fully under this kind of license. Thanks, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.