Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:53:33 -0500 From: John Von Essen <John.VonEssen@....com> To: "'popa3d-users@...ts.openwall.com'" <popa3d-users@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: RE: pop-before-smtp on Linux... Well, all the includes exist, so I guess it could be version issue. I have: # ls -l /lib/libdb* root root 251476 Nov 30 2004 libdb2.so.3 root root 614112 Nov 30 2004 libdb-3.3.so root root 762496 Nov 30 2004 libdb-4.1.so root root 843984 Dec 11 2004 libdb-4.2.so root root 11 Jan 13 12:55 libdb.so.3 -> libdb2.so.3 # ls -l /usr/include/db* root root 12 Jan 13 12:57 /usr/include/db_185.h -> db4/db_185.h root root 12 Jan 13 12:57 /usr/include/db_cxx.h -> db4/db_cxx.h root root 8 Jan 13 12:57 /usr/include/db.h -> db4/db.h /usr/include/db4: total 140 root root 5943 Dec 11 2004 db_185.h root root 33210 Dec 11 2004 db_cxx.h root root 80355 Dec 11 2004 db.h Not sure why a version issue would cause the implicit declare error - it must be finding the function. If I do a "man dbopen" - the function appears to be available. Thanks John Von Essen -----Original Message----- From: Georg Horn [mailto:horn@...lenz-net.de] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 12:47 PM To: popa3d-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [popa3d-users] pop-before-smtp on Linux... Am Mon den 16. Januar 2006 um 12:14 Uhr schrieb John Von Essen: > I was able to satisy the flock error by including <sys/file.h> in pop_db.c > but still get implicit error on dbopen function. Tried adding an include for > limits.h - but no change. I think you have a newer version of the db library on your system. I too had to modify my own patch for smtp-after-pop some time ago... Take a look at /lib/libdb* und /usr/include/db* Good bye, Georg __________________________________________________________ This message was scanned by ATX 12:47:17 PM ET - 1/16/2006
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.