Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 00:03:42 +0300 From: gremlin@...mlin.ru To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Owl future On 2015-01-02 16:27:29 +0000, Simon Baker wrote: > Imho, without embracing kvm, and therefore taking on that > clusterfuck of a security model, Whaaaat? I use Owl as a both VZ and KVM virtualization host without any bloatware: gremlin@...l:~ > psg win7 27690 ? Sl 24:24 qemu -enable-kvm -m 512 -display none -net nic,model=e1000 -net tap,script=/etc/qemu/qemu-ifup-lan -monitor unix:/tmp/qemu/control/win7.image.sock,server,nowait -hda /home/KVM/win7.image > you cannot compete with red hat et al in the enterprise space. > That said, I don't believe that was ever your intention. gremlin@...l:~ > nc -U /tmp/qemu/control/win7.image.sock QEMU 1.4.0 monitor - type 'help' for more information (qemu) info kvm kvm support: enabled (qemu) help migrate migrate [-d] [-b] [-i] uri -- migrate to URI (using -d to not wait for completion) -b for migration without shared storage with full copy of disk -i for migration without shared storage with incremental copy of disk (base image shared between src and destination) Do you need other KVM features? Qemu has all of them. Do you want a Web interface? You are welcome to write a non-bloated one. Do you expect qemu to appear in a mainstream? Everything is possible. > For me, Owl is turning in to an heirloom linux. And, that is not > a bad goal. That's not a goal at all. > Keep it small, keep it safe, and keep it tidy. We'd try... :-) -- Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin <gremlin ПРИ gremlin ТЧК ru> GPG: 8832FE9FA791F7968AC96E4E909DAC45EF3B1FA8 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.