Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:00:57 +0400
From: Malykh Oleg <o.malykh@...s.ru>
To: "'owl-users@...ts.openwall.com'" <owl-users@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: Kernel build and bonding

Dear Alexander,

Thank you very much!

Best regards

Oleg Malykh
IT Support Department

JSC "Martin Bauer Management"
Phone +7 495 7059376
Fax     +7 495 7059373
gsm    +7 916 1139938
o.malykh@...s.ru


-----Original Message-----
From: Solar Designer [mailto:solar@...nwall.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:38 PM
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [owl-users] Kernel build and bonding

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:52:46PM +0400, Malykh Oleg wrote:
> You right! When I've moved function bond_slave_override above function bond_xmit_roundrobin module compiled without any errors. Thank you very much.

You're welcome.  JFYI, the new kernel in today's Owl-current snapshot is
compiled with CONFIG_BONDING=m (and the inlining issue patched).  So if
you upgrade to this version, you shouldn't need to build a custom kernel.

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.